Re: Request for clarification of RTF 5424 Section 6.2.5(APP-NAME)
t.petch <[email protected]> Tue, 11 Jun 2013 09:41:35 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.syslog |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
----- Original Message ----- From: "Remeika, James C." <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 10:48 PM The APP-NAME field definition in RCF 5424 header says that "[i]t is a string without further semantics", and the ABNF definition of the field is 1*48PRINTUSASCII, which to my reading indicates that the space character is allowed. <tp> RFC5424 says to me " SP = %d32 PRINTUSASCII = %d33-126 " which says to me that the SP[ace character] is not allowed. Not sure why we have different readings. Tom Petch </tp> The same is true for the field PROCID, which follows APP-NAME: space characters seem to be allowed. How can this be allowed, if the values within the header are delimited by spaces. It seems like the two value sets for APP-NAME and PROCID would be indistinguishable: ++MESSAGE A++ APP-NAME: "cat dog" PROCID: "rabbit" ++MESSAGE B++ APP-NAME: "cat" PROCID: "dog rabbit" Thanks for your consideration, James Remeika ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------- > _______________________________________________ > Syslog mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog > _______________________________________________ Syslog mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog