Re: Multi-AS needs : draft-zhang-mpls-interas-te-req-02.txt

Hi Jim,

I think the latter is correct.
We need to extend a existing protocol(e.g. RSVP-TE) because a current
RSVP-TE can't cover an inter-AS TE.

We try to extend a current RSVP-TE in our draft.

Regards,
Kenji 

> 
> I'm wondering, do these requirements stand outside of current protocol 
> capabilities?  By that I mean, are current protocols one of the approaches 
> that should be considered to meet these needs? 
> 
> Or is it assumed that they can not, and this requirements document is an 
> attempt to build a foundation upon which to augment existing protocols?
> 
> thanks!
> 
> Jim
> 
>

-- 
Kenji Kumaki <[email protected]>