DSTE over Bundle RE: Agenda for TEWG @ IETF 56 (fwd)
"Francois Le Faucheur (flefauch)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.tewg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Ed, Jim, As per my earlier request to you, we would like to have a very short slot on "draft-sivabalan-diff-te-bundling-01.txt". For memory, -00 was presented in Atlanta. Thanks Francois >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Edward Kern [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: 12 March 2003 21:03 >> To: Ash, Gerald R (Jerry), ALABS; Jim Boyle >> Cc: Ash, Gerald R (Jerry), ALABS; [email protected]; >> Wijnen, Bert (Bert); Scott Bradner; Lai, Wai S (Waisum), ALABS >> Subject: RE: Agenda for TEWG @ IETF 56 (fwd) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > You didn't ask for suggested agenda items >> >> Your correct we didn't. >> >> >> > (I guess it's your prerogative >> > to just decree the agenda) >> >> Your again correct, it is. >> >> >, but here are suggestions anyway. >> > >> >> 30 Diffserv TE Francois >> >> - Requirements >> >> - Protocol >> >> - BC Models >> >> - Russian >> >> - MAM >> > >> > Most of the on-going discussion/issues relative to DSTE is >> on BC models, >> > including MAR >> > >> http://ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ash-mpls-dste-bcmodel-m >> ax-alloc-res >> > v-01.txt. So I think MAR should be included in the BC >> models discussion >> > (per attached email). There's been a fair amount of >> discussion of MAR on >> > the list, I don't think you should just ignore it. >> >> >> Not ignored it just didn't make the list because it has not >> had as much >> discussion >> as the others. I have no issue tacking MAR on the end though. >> >> >> > >> > Furthermore, I don't think it's appropriate to designate >> Francois to >> > discuss Wai Sum's I-D on MAM >> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-wlai-tewg-bcmodel-01.txt. >> >> Francois is leading the overall discussion like he has done >> in the past. >> It wasn't >> his intent or our desire to have him discussing other >> authors papers unless >> they are >> not present. Wai Sum is of course more then welcome to lead >> the discussion >> around MAM. >> >> >> > >> > I suggest some of the time allocated to Francois' >> discussion be allocated >> > to Wai Sum and me for discussion of MAM & MAR, respectively. >> >> A section of time will be made available consistant with the >> time given to >> others, it >> may or may not be carved from francois's time. >> >> >> >> >> 45 Multi Area / Multi AS TE >> >> - Operational perspective Anyone? >> >> - draft-zhang update Zhang >> > >> > Good to see multi-area TE back in the TEWG discussion. >> Perhaps it's time >> > to resurrect the multi-area TE requirements: >> > >> http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/ietf->> announce/Current/msg15882.html >> > expired, but still available at: >> > >> http://www.watersprings.org/links/mlr/id/draft-ash-multi-area -te-reqmts-0 > 1.txt Since this is not a request for time I wont speak of it besides to say I have no burning desire to drag out expired drafts. Ed