RE: Progressing BC Models was RE: Progressing MAR

"Ash, Gerald R (Jerry), ALABS" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.tewg
Message-ID <[email protected]>
>> Also, if one does too much soft preemption, and forces a lot 
>> of flows off of short routes onto much longer, inefficient 
>> routes, this would (perhaps severely) degrade network 
>> performance.  There are studies which show that effect.  
>> One of the applications of bandwidth reservation mechanisms 
>> (as in MAR), used in large-scale networks today, is to 
>> protect against such an effect.

> I am not sure how soft preemption, referring to the recent draft, forces
> flows off short routes onto longer ones.  Are you referring to preemption
> itself, regardless of whether its hard or soft?

The draft says: 
"a new preemption pending flag helps more gracefully mitigate the re-route process of displaced LSPs."

It's the re-routing of preempted LSPs (onto longer paths) that I'm referring to.

Jerry
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.