RE: Progressing BC Models was RE: Progressing MAR
"Ash, Gerald R (Jerry), ALABS" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.tewg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>> Also, if one does too much soft preemption, and forces a lot >> of flows off of short routes onto much longer, inefficient >> routes, this would (perhaps severely) degrade network >> performance. There are studies which show that effect. >> One of the applications of bandwidth reservation mechanisms >> (as in MAR), used in large-scale networks today, is to >> protect against such an effect. > I am not sure how soft preemption, referring to the recent draft, forces > flows off short routes onto longer ones. Are you referring to preemption > itself, regardless of whether its hard or soft? The draft says: "a new preemption pending flag helps more gracefully mitigate the re-route process of displaced LSPs." It's the re-routing of preempted LSPs (onto longer paths) that I'm referring to. Jerry