RE: Preemption with MAM RE:
Dimitry Haskin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.tewg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Francois, > > It may be that another model which has independent bandwidth > constraint + aggregate constraint (this would basically be a > hybrid between MAM and RDM) is a reasonable idea; but this is > not MAM as it is currently defined. > Incidentally this is exactly what I have been assuming regarding the MAM model. However I agree this is not reflected in the current MAM specification(s). Dimitry > Cheers > > Francois >