RE: (a) Inter-Area, (b) Inter-AS (c) both (d) neither

"Ash, Gerald R (Jerry), ALABS" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.tewg
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I agree that we should progress a) and b) independently, but take note of any possible synergies.

Also, icw item a):

Sudheer> Should we revive our inter-area drafts now
Jim> yes, please do.

Several of us collaborated on multi-area TE requirements a while back: http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/ietf-announce/Current/msg15882.html
has expired, but is still available at:
http://www.watersprings.org/links/mlr/id/draft-ash-multi-area-te-reqmts-01.txt

This can be updated and progressed if there is interest.

Thanks,
Jerry
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.