RE: (a) Inter-Area, (b) Inter-AS (c) both (d) neither
"Ash, Gerald R (Jerry), ALABS" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.tewg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I agree that we should progress a) and b) independently, but take note of any possible synergies. Also, icw item a): Sudheer> Should we revive our inter-area drafts now Jim> yes, please do. Several of us collaborated on multi-area TE requirements a while back: http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/ietf-announce/Current/msg15882.html has expired, but is still available at: http://www.watersprings.org/links/mlr/id/draft-ash-multi-area-te-reqmts-01.txt This can be updated and progressed if there is interest. Thanks, Jerry