RE: WG last call: draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-russian-02.txt

"Francois Le Faucheur (flefauch)" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.tewg
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Jim,

The enhancement to the MAM definition that we're discussing has ripple
effects into -proto and into -russian (BTW from memory I think that
would address part, or all, of Waisum's comment).

So I would suggest issueing a new rev of -proto and -russian with the
corresponding edits before posting to IESG. I could post those fairly
quickly once we've concluded on the MAM definition on the list.

Makes sense?

Cheers

Francois

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jim Boyle [mailto:[email protected]] 
>> Sent: 24 April 2003 21:38
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: WG last call: draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-russian-02.txt
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> This WG last call has ended.  There was one comment by 
>> Waisum, I don't 
>> think it was to object to this document.
>> 
>> Therefore this document is completed for WG discussion at this time.
>> 
>> It will be forwarded to IESG with the PROTO draft, which is 
>> through the 
>> 2nd week of it's 3 week WG last call.  
>> 
>> thanks,
>> 
>> Jim
>> 
>> On Tue, 8 Apr 2003, Jim Boyle wrote:
>> 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-r
ussian-02.txt
> 
> This is WG last call for this draft to be advanced as expiremental
RFC.
> 
> Last call ends in 2 weeks (4/22).
> 
> thanks,
> 
> Jim Boyle
> 
> 
> 
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.