RE: AD review of: draft-ietf-tewg-measure-05.txt

Bert,

| > 'I would expect a CRISP set of "requirements for additional 
| > measurements, configurable/negotiable parameters/controls" 
| > ... but not the extensive exploration and text that I now see'.

I understood the document to be a Framework Document. Crisp 
requirements may be part of a requirements doc or the like. 

The quality of the document is good as a Framework Document.
I'd agree that an architecture or requirements doc 
getting more precise might be useful.  
Different network types and design philosophies result 
in different measurement requirements. I'm not sure whether an 
acceptable "General TE measurement requirements" doc is feasible.

| I do not consider them as speaking for their company, but indeed as
| individuals. I'd like to see comments/review/support from all 
| types of operators, that is carriers, telecom operators, cors ISPs,
| Access ISPs, small ISPs, Enterpise Networks... etc.

I wasn't aware that there's something like an IESG qualification 
profile if you want to vote on last call. I'd suggest that these 
profiles are published with the last call, so that people whose opinion 
isn't asked may save the time they've wasted on reading the document.

Regards, Rüdiger