RE: AD review of: draft-ietf-tewg-measure-05.txt
raymond zhang <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.tewg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Bert, At 03:51 PM 5/5/2003 +0200, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote: >Inline > > -----Original Message----- > > From: raymond zhang [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: donderdag 1 mei 2003 16:45 > > To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert); Tewg (E-mail) > > Subject: Re: AD review of: draft-ietf-tewg-measure-05.txt > > > > Hi Bert, > > Sorry for the delayed response... > > >No problem. > > > At 03:13 AM 4/25/2003 +0200, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote: > > >My summary: > > > > > >- a lot of text... but not very focused and to the point (or at least > > > I have trouble seeing the main points) > > >- not a "framework", rather an exploration of TE measurement > > > related topics (more like a summary-introduction) > > >- I am not an operator, but I think if I were one, then > > > - if we were already doing TE measurement stuff (most likely) then > > > reading it seems a waste of time > > > > Ray - Well, we have policies and implementations at different > > degrees for many of the areas touched upon by the draft but > > not all... It is indeed helpful to look at this as framework for > > any further work to refine our current processes. > > >Do you really mean "framework" or is it more >a "pool of things to consider"? You may have a point there. Maybe more like a set of guidelines. Important ones though in my view... >.. snip .. > > > > - Raymond Zhang is positive. He is from info.net ??? is that an > operator? > > > > I am form INFONET ( a global SP). > > >Thanks for informing me. And appology that I did not know. No problem at all... Cheers, Raymond >.. snip .. > >Bert