RE: Reflecting new-MAM/SAM definition in diff-te drafts
"Francois Le Faucheur (flefauch)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.tewg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello Jerry, >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Dimitry Haskin [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: 25 April 2003 22:28 >> To: 'Ash, Gerald R (Jerry), ALABS'; Francois Le Faucheur (flefauch) >> Cc: [email protected] >> Subject: RE: Reflecting new-MAM/SAM definition in diff-te drafts >> >> >> Gerald, >> >> > 3. The 'maximum link bandwidth' parameter is a physical >> > constraint and serves to limit the assignable sum of link >> > bandwidth across class types. In the recent discussion, this >> > constraint has sometimes been referred to as an 'implicit max >> > link BW constraint'. However there is nothing 'implicit' >> > about this constraint/parameter, it is an existing link >> > parameter and a physical constraint on assignable link bandwidth. >> > 4. Given comment #3, we don't need to use the 'max reservable >> > link bandwidth' parameter instead of the 'maximum link >> > bandwidth' parameter, as you have proposed. >> >> The 'maximum link bandwidth' as defined is the actual link >> capacity and not >> meant to be used as a reservation constraint. The 'max >> reservable link >> bandwidth' was originally defined for this purpose. The >> amount of confusion >> around these definitions puzzles me. >> Do you agree with Dimitry's point that it is the "Max Reservable Bandwidth" that should be used for constraining reservations (across Class-Types) - not the "Max Link Bw"- ? If yes, would you agree that the following rules would apply for the "new MAM" definition: o for each value of b in the range 0 <= b <= 7: Reserved (CTb) <= BCb, o SUM (Reserved (CTc)) <= Max Reservable Bandwidth, for all "c" in the range 0 <= c <= (MaxCT-1) Thanks Francois >> Dimitry >> >> P.S. Excerpts from draft-katz-yeung-ospf-traffic-09.txt: >> >> >> 2.5.6. Maximum Bandwidth >> >> The Maximum Bandwidth sub-TLV specifies the maximum bandwidth that >> can be used on this link in this direction (from the system >> originating the LSA to its neighbor), in IEEE floating >> point format. >> This is the true link capacity. The units are bytes per second. >> >> The Maximum Bandwidth sub-TLV is TLV type 6, and is four octets in >> length. >> >> 2.5.7. Maximum Reservable Bandwidth >> >> The Maximum Reservable Bandwidth sub-TLV specifies the maximum >> bandwidth that may be reserved on this link in this direction, in >> IEEE floating point format. Note that this may be >> greater than the >> maximum bandwidth (in which case the link may be oversubscribed). >> This SHOULD be user-configurable; the default value should be the >> Maximum Bandwidth. The units are bytes per second. >> >> The Maximum Reservable Bandwidth sub-TLV is TLV type 7, >> and is four >> octets in length. >>