RE: Reflecting new-MAM/SAM definition in diff-te drafts
"Ash, Gerald R (Jerry), ALABS" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.tewg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <9473683187ADC049A855ED2DA739ABCA011BE91E@KCCLUST06EVS1.ugd.att.com> |
Dimitry, Francois,
> > o SUM (Reserved (CTc)) <= Max Reservable Bandwidth,
> > for all "c" in the range 0 <= c <= (MaxCT-1)
> >
> > However, this formula is incorrect for DS-TE when per-CT
> > LOM's are used, since the above formula only reflects the Max
> > Reservable Bandwidth for the entire link, and does not
> > reflect the per-CT local overbooking factors. So what
> > formula do you suggest when per-CT LOM's are used?
> Wouldn't 'Reserved (CTc)' it the above formula already accounts for the
> overbooking multiplier at CTc? I don't see how this formula precludes
> per-CT LOM's to be used. Please explain.
Are you then proposing these formulas:
1. When per-CT LOMs are not used:
o SUM (Reserved(CTc)) <= Max Reservable Bandwidth,
for all "c" in the range 0 <= c <= (MaxCT-1)
2. When per-CT LOMs are used:
o SUM (Normalized(CTc)) <= Max Reservable Bandwidth,
for all "c" in the range 0 <= c <= (MaxCT-1)
Is that correct? Please confirm, and/or give the formulas you propose.
Thanks,
Jerry