RE: Reflecting new-MAM/SAM definition in diff-te drafts
"Francois Le Faucheur (flefauch)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.tewg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Jerry, >> >> Yes, we need a formula to make explicit the 'implicit' >> constraint (and for all the BC models, not just MAM). >> That's a good point. With RDM, the proposed formula of: >> o SUM (Normalized(CTc)) <= Max Reservable Bandwidth, >> for all "c" in the range 0 <= c <= (MaxCT-1) already applies, since we have: - SUM (Normalised(CTc)) <= BC0, and - BC0=Max Reservable Bw It would be nice to have exact same formula also apply to MAM. Cheers Francois