RE: Reflecting new-MAM/SAM definition in diff-te drafts

"Francois Le Faucheur (flefauch)" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.tewg
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Jerry,

>> 
>> Yes, we need a formula to make explicit the 'implicit' 
>> constraint (and for all the BC models, not just MAM).
>> 

That's a good point.

With RDM, the proposed formula of:
>>      o SUM (Normalized(CTc)) <= Max Reservable Bandwidth, 
>>          for all "c" in the range 0 <= c <= (MaxCT-1)

already applies, since we have:
	- SUM (Normalised(CTc)) <= BC0, and
	- BC0=Max Reservable Bw

It would be nice to have exact same formula also apply to MAM.

Cheers

Francois
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.