RE: Dropping the Local Overbooking Multiplier (LOM) method from DS-TE specs?

"Ash, Gerald R (Jerry), ALABS" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.tewg
Message-ID <9473683187ADC049A855ED2DA739ABCA011BE945@KCCLUST06EVS1.ugd.att.com> 
Francois,

> Thoughts on dropping/keeping LOM in base DS-TE specs?

I certainly favor dropping LOM if there is only weak justification.  There seems to be ample flexibility in overbooking with both 'Link Size Overbooking' and 'LSP Size Overbooking' options available.

Thanks,
Jerry
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.