RE: Dropping the Local Overbooking Multiplier (LOM) method from DS-TE specs?

"Francois Le Faucheur (flefauch)" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.tewg
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
Sanjay,

>> > 
>> > Overall, I don't think the case has been made to drop LOM, 
>> 
>>   Personally, I agree with this view [given that LOM is already
>>   an optional feature]
>>

Fair enough. 
Now at the same time we have a number of people (Siva, I believe Dimitry
and Siva) who indicated preference for dropping LOM. So I'm trying to
find out something we can agree on. Which is why I am folloiwng up on
your "second choice" in my other email 8^)

Cheers

Francois
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.