RE: AD evaluation: draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-mar-02.txt
Ina Minei <[email protected]> Thu, 8 Jan 2004 16:19:26 -0800 (PST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.tewg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Bert, So can we just agree on 32 "experimental/vendor private" numbers starting at 255 and down? Thank you, Ina On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, Ina Minei wrote: > > > Bert, > > I think we both agree :). and in the end it all boils down to > experimental vs vendor-private. What I am thinking of > is vendor-private numbers, and what you are thinking of is experimental. > We are both right. How we decide to solve it is a different issue. > > We can either: 1) allocate two spaces, one for experimental and > one for vendor-private. In that case, 3 should be enough for experimental, > but as for vendor-private more than 3 would be required, for the reason I > was mentioning in the original mail or 2) allocate one bigger space for > both experimental and vendor-private. I prefer (2). > > Let's just pick one of the options, and carry it forward. Let me > know what you prefer. > > Ina >