RE: AD evaluation: draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-mar-02.txt
"Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <[email protected]> Sun, 11 Jan 2004 23:36:15 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.tewg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B155033D3C7A@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com> |
Some people who want to form an opinion on the size of experimental/vendor-private name-space may find it useful to check draft-narten-iana-experimental-allocations-05.txt and specificall ysect 1.1. It is only a few pages... Thanks, Bert > -----Original Message----- > From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: vrijdag 9 januari 2004 12:10 > To: Ina Minei; Wijnen, Bert (Bert) > Cc: Ash, Gerald R (Jerry), ALABS; Tewg (E-mail) > Subject: RE: AD evaluation: draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-mar-02.txt > > > Not sure why some people think (or that is how I > perceive your last email) that an AD has any more weight than > other WG members. I have made my opinion clear that I think > that 32 is far too much. > > I have asked WG chairs to check this also. > > It is best if WG chairs take initiative to drive resolution of > these questions. > > Thanks, > Bert > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ina Minei [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: vrijdag 9 januari 2004 1:19 > > To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) > > Cc: Ash, Gerald R (Jerry), ALABS; Tewg (E-mail) > > Subject: RE: AD evaluation: draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-mar-02.txt > > > > > > > > Bert, > > > > So can we just agree on 32 "experimental/vendor private" > > numbers starting at 255 and down? > > > > Thank you, > > > > Ina > > > > On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, Ina Minei wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Bert, > > > > > > I think we both agree :). and in the end it all boils down to > > > experimental vs vendor-private. What I am thinking of > > > is vendor-private numbers, and what you are thinking of is > > experimental. > > > We are both right. How we decide to solve it is a different issue. > > > > > > We can either: 1) allocate two spaces, one for experimental and > > > one for vendor-private. In that case, 3 should be enough > > for experimental, > > > but as for vendor-private more than 3 would be required, > > for the reason I > > > was mentioning in the original mail or 2) allocate one > > bigger space for > > > both experimental and vendor-private. I prefer (2). > > > > > > Let's just pick one of the options, and carry it forward. Let me > > > know what you prefer. > > > > > > Ina > > > > > >