Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-tewg-interas-mpls-te-req-03.txt

Raymond,

[clipped...]

> > > >I think that the latest version of the draft still require few
> > > >changes/updates.
> > > >
> > > >1. The document should state up front the following:
> > > >
> > > >       This document doesn't make any claims with respect to whether
> > > >       it is possible to have a practical solution that meets all the
> > > >       requirements listed in this document.
> > > >
> > > >(That point have been discussed before, and I thought the authors
> > > >agreed to include the above in the text, but I wasn't able to find
> > > >it in the -03 version).
> > >
> > > In section 6.1, I included wording "
> > >
> > > If a solution can fulfill just a subset of those requirements in
> > >     section 5, then it MUST be explicitly documented"
> > >
> >Would this reflect your point above ?
> >
> >No, I don't think this is sufficient. I really like to have the
> >sentence I suggested up front in the document.
> 
> Ok, no problem. I will add it in the intro section.

Thanks !!! Looking forward for the 04 version.

Yakov.