Re: AD review of: draft-ietf-tewg-interas-mpls-te-req-06.txt (fwd)
raymond zhang <[email protected]> Thu, 24 Jun 2004 11:25:42 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.tewg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Jim, Many thanks for looking it over... [snip...] These are very minor nits at this point, so no need to resubmit just >for this at this time. Ok, I will go ahead fix what've suggested below but will not resubmit at=20 this time. > 1. ID-nits check: > > $ idnits-v1.24 <drafts/draft-ietf-tewg-interas-mpls-te-req-06.txt > > idnits 1.24, 16 Apr 2004, 07:05 > > > > Line 479 contains non-ascii character in position 29. > > --> network. This allows SP1=C6s customers connected to SP2 PE=20 > router to > > ^ > >still not fixed, please do so. I thought I did... Will do. > > 2. Pls remove section: draft-ietf-tewg-interas-mpls-te-req-06.txt > > This makes no sense once it gets to "Publication requested" stage. > >Not done, please remove >"Summary for Sub-IP related Internet Drafts" >to >"interoperable with current intra-AS traffic engineering mechanisms." Will do, thanks... > > > 6. Lots of acronyms are used without being expanded the first time thye > > are used. > >I trust you took this into consideration Yes... I've gone through all of them and expanded where it is needed. > > > > 7. Sect 6.1 .... MMM.... what does it really mean? > > It is so flexible, that ... oh well ... > > > > 8. End of sect 6.2 says: > > Other criteria might be added as this draft will evolve. > > while this draft is now "complete", no? > >Section 6 is gone now, which should address (7) and (8). >What is stated, is what is required. Right... Thanks once again. Regards, Raymond