[TLS] Re: [Ssh] Re: MLKEM Consensus Call (was WG Las t Call: draft-ietf-tls-mlkem-08 (Ends 2026-07-08))

Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> Sun, 19 Jul 2026 18:43:50 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.tls
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hiya,

On 19/07/2026 18:26, Ken Kubota wrote:
> 
> As the SSH mailing list is also plagued

We've (SSHM) overcome our KEM controversies, thanks. :-)
And would like it to stay that way. A reading of the list
archive should make that apparent.

This draft and discussion doesn't involve the SSH list
(which I've put in bcc), so I'd encourage people to not
further copy the SSHM WG list on the topic. While some
spillover due to copying both list may be inevitable,
I'd ask that people please remove the SSH list from any
replies.

Thanks,
Stephen (SSHM co-chair)

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
OpenPGP_signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 236 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

wnsEABYIACMWIQQwbnhHy1kPJkWsM6fk2On5l6gz3QUCal0M1wUDAAAAAAAKCRDk2On5l6gz3bsV
AP4rSq0t3TtJY+8ClTRUIjlv/1pALDhYuD9PWNjl++Gh+AD8DWyCFakbDGfbtDhX7YuAQiJOjHGy
GQzKL8Mc4rFg+g0=
=iVOk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----