Re: TN5250E Draft
Jeff Stevens <jstevens=DhXWPJtHtuFWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> Fri, 27 Jun 2003 10:38:14 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.ibm.midrange,gmane.ietf.tn3270e |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 6/25/2003 5:06 PM, Scott Klement wrote: > It appears that you've added support for SHA and Kerberos passwords in the > IBMSUBSPW uservar, and also the IBMSENDCONFREC option. Is there a > minimum version of OS/400 required to use these? Are any PTFs required > to enable this? I did not see any mention of this in the draft. SHA support starts in V5R1 (no PTF's required). Kerberos support starts V5R2 (no PTF's required). > Also, at one point in the document, it states: > > A client should either send a negative acknowledgment (WONT NEW- > ENVIRON), or at some point after completing terminal-type > negotiations, but before completing the full set of negotiations > required for 5250 transparent mode, engage in environment option > sub-negotiation with the server. > > But then later states: > > There are some reasons you may want to send NEW-ENVIRON negotiations > prior to TERMINAL-TYPE negotiations. > ... > The iSeries TELNET server will create the desired virtual device at > the first opportunity it thinks it has all the requested attributes > needed to create the device. This can be as early as completion of > the TERMINAL-TYPE negotiations. > > This is very confusing. The first paragraph specifically tells me to > do the NEW-ENVIRON after completing the TERMINAL-TYPE, and the later > paragraphs seem to tell me that it's important to do the NEW-ENVIRON > before the TERMINAL-TYPE. If you're going to issue a new draft of > this document, it'd be very nice if you could clarify that in the > document. What we show most in the RFC are 5250 device examples, which may take a different negotiations path than 3270/VTxxx devices. For example, 5250 device negotiations "complete" when EOR and BINARY negotiations for transparent mode are completed, but these are normally missing from 3270/VTxxx negotiations. You should be able to do your NEW-ENVIRON and TERMINAL-TYPE negotiations in either order, we simply recommend they be done consecutively so that they are settled before "other" negotiations (e.g. EOR/BINARY). I'm not sure how you would have us say this? -- Jeffrey Stevens _______________________________________________ This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L=Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/[email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request=Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/[email protected] Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.