Re: Next step for voucher specifications

Hi,

I generally agree with you. I think -vtsapi-03- should be updated and 
then I can do a WG last call.

Thanks,
Donald
======================================================================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd                       [email protected]
 155 Beaver Street              +1-508-634-2066(h) +1-508-851-8280(w)
 Milford, MA 01757 USA                   [email protected]

On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Ko Fujimura wrote:

> Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 17:55:50 +0900
> From: Ko Fujimura <[email protected]>
> To: Donald Eastlake 3rd <[email protected]>,
>      [email protected]
> Subject: Next step for voucher specifications
> 
> Hello Donald,
> 
> I think it was the working group consensus to go ahead the following drafts
> to the WG last call at the working group at Yokohama in last summer, and
> no futher issue pointed out so far.
> 
>   draft-ietf-trade-voucher-lang-04.txt
>   draft-ietf-trade-voucher-vtsapi-03.txt
> 
> Please let me know if there are any issues to be discussed.
> Would you announce the WG last call, if not.
> 
> BTW, the reference section of -vtsapi-03-, points to the old references
> of [ECML] and [GVL]. Do we should update the draft before the WG last call?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Ko
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> Dr. Ko Fujimura, NTT Information Sharing Platform Laboratories
> 1-1 Hikarinooka, Yokosuka-shi, Kanagawa 239-0847, JAPAN
> Tel: +81-(0)46-859-3814, Fax: +81-(0)46-859-8329
> Email: [email protected]
> 
> 
> 
> 
>