Re: [tsvwg] Connection Identifier Flow Indicator (CIDFI)
Tom Herbert <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.apps-discuss,gmane.ietf.tsvwg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CALx6S37ChWn4BjNT9cZ75-9tiXaEpmqnhJQz22b9T=MtvAvwDg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, Aug 17, 2023, 10:45 AM Dan Wing <[email protected]> wrote: > Reply-To: [email protected] > > We have a new proposal for using Connection Identifiers to signal > host-to-network and network-to-host. The CIDs can be QUIC CIDs or DTLS > CIDs. > > The CIDFI proposal has commonality with the I-D's in the CC line, most of > which were presented at IETF117 in TSVAREA, QUIC, DISCUSS, and V6OPS. > CIDFI takes a different approach. CIDFI does not use UDP trailers, allows > the client and server to choose their Connection IDs however they wish, > works on IPv4 and IPv6 (including through NATs and IPv6/IPv4 translators), > and avoids the network operator's equipment connecting to the content > server (which would identify the server to the network operator). > Hi Dan, Thanks for the draft. Offhand it looks this solution provides signaling specifically for QUIC. Is there a route here for a general solution that could be used across different transport protocols or applications (TCP, SCTP, RTP, custom app protocols in UDP, etc.)? Could the host to network signaling part be a use case of FAST (draft-herbert-fast-06)? Tom > Abstract: > > This document describes how clients and servers can cooperate with > network elements so their QUIC and DTLS streams can be augmented with > information about network conditions and packet importance. > > As Matt's SADCDN was DISPATCH'd to ART area, I set reply-to to > [email protected] > > editor's copy, https://danwing.github.io/cidfi/draft-wing-cidfi.html > published -00, https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-wing-cidfi-00.html > > -d > > _______________________________________________ art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art