Re: [tsvwg] [IPv6] [IPFIX] errata eid7775 RE: [**EXTERNAL**] RE: WG LC: IPFIX documents

"C. M. Heard" <[email protected]> Tue, 6 Feb 2024 15:23:55 -0800
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.opsawg,gmane.ietf.tcpm,gmane.ietf.tsvwg
Message-ID <CACL_3VE1c=7v4ZsXd9bsZ0UjCdY_Kw6BA-Mkt2YvyPXxB5+oQA@mail.gmail.com>
Please padron an interruption from the gallery, but:

On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 2:49 PM Bob Hinden wrote:

> I would put it differently.    Anyone can report an errata, the Area
> Directors make the decision if the errata is accepted.   That may including
> checking with the authors.   They do not check with the company where the
> authors worked at the time the RFC was published.
>

If the RFC documents a proprietary protocol, it seems to me that it would
be insane for the ADs not to check with the organization that controls that
protocol.

Mike Heard

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg