Re: [tsvwg] [IPv6] [IPFIX] errata eid7775 RE: [**EXTERNAL**] RE: WG LC: IPFIX documents
"C. M. Heard" <[email protected]> Tue, 6 Feb 2024 15:23:55 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.opsawg,gmane.ietf.tcpm,gmane.ietf.tsvwg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CACL_3VE1c=7v4ZsXd9bsZ0UjCdY_Kw6BA-Mkt2YvyPXxB5+oQA@mail.gmail.com> |
Please padron an interruption from the gallery, but: On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 2:49 PM Bob Hinden wrote: > I would put it differently. Anyone can report an errata, the Area > Directors make the decision if the errata is accepted. That may including > checking with the authors. They do not check with the company where the > authors worked at the time the RFC was published. > If the RFC documents a proprietary protocol, it seems to me that it would be insane for the ADs not to check with the organization that controls that protocol. Mike Heard _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg