[Int-area] Re: IP Parcels and Advanced Jumbos (AJs)

> On Sep 27, 2024, at 7:58 AM, Templin (US), Fred L <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Indeed. But if sendmsg() and recvmsg() can and do generate RFC2675 packets, it means that any discussion of obsoleting RFC2675 should be
>> off the table.
> 
> No one that I know of has suggested obsoleting RFC2675 - my documents do not say "obsoletes" (nor even "updates”).

That approach to UDP jumbo grams is incompatible with UDP options. 

And yes, there was a proposal to move that RFC to historic:

Jones, T., G. Fairhurst, "Change Status of RFC 2675 to Historic," draft-jones-6man-historic-rfc2675, May 2019.

We COULD have a new option with a longer length, but that’s not in our baseline draft.

Joe

_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]