[Int-area] Re: [IPsec] New Version Notification for draf t-white-intarea-reordering-04.txt
Joe Touch <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.int,gmane.ietf.tsvwg,gmane.ietf.ipsec |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
A brief note on this: > On Aug 3, 2026, at 4:51 PM, Greg White <[email protected]> wrote: > > On your final point that it isn’t clear that this document is saying anything different from RFC3819: yes, the two excerpts you quoted aren’t markedly different, and Section 1 paragraph 2 <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-white-intarea-reordering-04.html#section-1-2> indicates that the main issue with RFC3819 isn’t that statement, it is the text that follows. Also, I think we’ll end up with more concrete recommendations than what are in the draft currently. The doc remains accurate - every compression mechanism and TCP *at that time* reacted poorly to reordering. It seems obvious that modern guidance would be to consider whether that has changed. Do we really need a new document to say just that? Joe _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]