[media-types] Re: Media type review request for draft-ietf-a vtcore-rtp-v3c
"Murray S. Kucherawy" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.types |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAL0qLwZUop_fffKfLXyA6VkaP8+C6AQEHYCv3cD65JKKu6kwZA@mail.gmail.com> |
The media type registration template looks good to me here. The draft itself may get some comments about the SHALL NOT text at the end of Section 11; you're asserting a normative constraint against a format that's already defined. If RTP is incapable of transporting executable content, I think you just need to say that. On the other hand, if you're saying components of a system using this media type SHALL NOT construct RTP payloads that contain executable content, I think that would be more clear. -MSK -MSK <https://www.norton.com> Virus-free.www.norton.com <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> On Tue, Aug 5, 2025 at 3:51 AM Lauri Ilola (Nokia) <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Marius & Murray, > > > > Thank you for the feedback and suggestions. I’ve made a new version of the > draft available hopefully addressing the remaining suggestions ( > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-v3c/10/). Below > you can find a copy of the updated media type registration section: > > > > --- > > > > Type name: application > > > > Subtype name: v3c > > > > Required parameters: N/A > > > > Optional parameters: sprop-v3c-unit-header, sprop-v3c-unit-type, > > sprop-v3c-vps-id, sprop-v3c-atlas-id, sprop-v3c-attr-idx, > > sprop-v3c-attr-part-idx, sprop-v3c-map-idx, sprop-v3c-aux-video-flag, > > sprop-v3c-parameter-set, sprop-v3c-tile-id, sprop-v3c-tile-id-pres, > > sprop-v3c-atlas-data, sprop-v3c-common-atlas-data, sprop-v3c-sei, > > v3c-ptl-level-idc, v3c-ptl-tier-flag, v3c-ptl-codec-idc, > > v3c-ptl-toolset-idc, v3c-ptl-rec-idc and sprop-max-don-diff. > > > > Encoding considerations: framed > > > > Security considerations: Please see Section 11 > <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-v3c-10.html#name-security-considerations> > > > > Interoperability considerations: N/A > > > > Published specification: Please refer to ISO/IEC 23090-5 > <https://www.iso.org/standard/89030.html> > > > > Applications that use this media type: Any application that relies on > > V3C-based media services over RTP > > > > Additional information: N/A > > > > Person & email address to contact for further information: Lauri Ilola ( > [email protected]) or Lukasz Kondrad ([email protected]) > > > > Intended usage: COMMON > > > > Restrictions on usage: N/A > > > > Author: See Authors' Addresses section of this memo. > > > > Change controller: IETF [email protected] > > > > Provisional registration? (standards tree only): No > > > > --- > > > > Please let me know if there are any remaining questions or concerns that > would need to be addressed. > > > > Kind Regards, > > -Lauri > > > > *From: *Murray S. Kucherawy <[email protected]> > *Date: *Wednesday, 23. July 2025 at 10:53 > *To: *Marius Kleidl <[email protected]> > *Cc: *[email protected] <[email protected]>, > [email protected] <[email protected]> > *Subject: *Re: [media-types] Media type review request for > draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-v3c > > Some people who received this message don't often get email from > [email protected]. Learn why this is important > <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> > > > > > > *CAUTION:* This is an external email. Please be very careful when > clicking links or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for > additional information. > > > > Hello Marius, > > > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 10:04 PM Marius Kleidl <marius= > [email protected]> wrote: > > Type name: application > > > > Subtype name: v3c > > > > Required parameters: N/A > > > > Optional parameters: sprop-v3c-unit-header, sprop-v3c-unit-type, > sprop-v3c-vps-id, sprop-v3c-atlas-id, sprop-v3c-attr-idx, > sprop-v3c-attr-part-idx, sprop-v3c-map-idx, sprop-v3c-aux-video-flag, > sprop-v3c-parameter-set, sprop-v3c-tile-id, sprop-v3c-tile-id-pres, > sprop-v3c-atlas-data, sprop-v3c-common-atlas-data, sprop-v3c-sei, > v3c-ptl-level-idc, v3c-ptl-tier-flag, v3c-ptl-codec-idc, > v3c-ptl-toolset-idc, v3c-ptl-rec-idc and sprop-max-don-diff. > > > > Encoding considerations: This type is only defined for transfer via RTP [ > RFC3550 > <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-v3c-08.html#RFC3550> > ]. > > > > Please see RFC 6838 Section 4.8 for a list of valid values here. > > > > Security considerations: Please see Section 11 > <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-v3c-08.html#Security-considerations> > . > > > > There's a large number of other documents referenced in your Section 11. > I didn't go into them all, but it's good there's a full treatment done. > The only sticking point for me would be that somewhere in that tree of > security recommendations, the question RFC 6838 poses about executable > content is answered. > > > > Interoperability considerations: N/A > > > > Published specification: Please refer to [ISO.IEC.23090-5 > <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-v3c-08.html#ISO.IEC.23090-5> > ] > > > > Applications that use this media type: Any application that relies on > V3C-based media services over RTP > > > > Additional information: N/A > > > > Person & email address to contact for further information: > > > > This needs to be completed. > > > > Intended usage: COMMON > > > > Restrictions on usage: N/A > > > > Author: See Authors' Addresses section of this memo. > > > > Change controller: IETF [email protected] > > > > Provisional registration? (standards tree only): No > > > > The optional parameters are defined as: (from > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-v3c-08.html#name-optional-parameters-definit > ) > > [...] > > > > This bit isn't necessary (or part of the template); the referenced > published specification is sufficient. > > > > -MSK > _______________________________________________ media-types mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]