[media-types] Re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-mediaman-6838bi s-06

Rahul Gupta <[email protected]> Thu, 16 Oct 2025 11:07:09 +0000

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.types
Message-ID	<jqbGaUb6Cgv7dMoFHlu9FYFultKzkdpNGyNzNaqeqMk8CL-4Ne2dde_lT3W18XqoY3YdlqCaKPmJhCHi0qIL-urXGcEbToXOYuqE5zaieew=@protonmail.com>

Hi Mediaman,

I think the document is ready for publication, but I have one concern (a few comments/suggestions) before it is sent to IESG.

>From the text, the process of registry maintenance is still unclear to me. I had previously raised the issue of missing templates in #7 and was at that time satisfied with Mark's suggestions. I believe Alexey is also looking into the specific registrations I pointed out. However, I would still prefer to see greater clarity on the maintenance procedure, from a 3rd party (or even a D.E.) identifying deficiencies in a registration to how they are to be rectified. If that process might come from IANAbis, that should be clarified here. 


Concerning that, I had also asked IANA about the possibility of maintaining a history of changes to a registration. I don't recall if this was discussed. I'll check back again during this IETF meeting.

For the comments please see issues #20, #78, #79. None of these are blockers.

BR/Rahul

PS: One peeve, if you might indulge me, is that the documents asks one to "note" things in quite a few places. And here I thought that everything in an RFC should be notable.

On Thursday, October 2nd, 2025 at 5:43 PM, Harald Alvestrand <[email protected]> wrote:

> This message initiates a Working Group Last Call on
> draft-ietf-mediaman-6838bis-06.
> 

> The Last Call lasts for 2 weeks, and ends on October 16, 2025, at 23:59 GMT.
> 

> To respond to the Last Call, respond on the mailing list with one of
> three forms:
> 

> - I have read draft-ietf-mediaman-6838bis-06, and think that it can be
> sent to the IESG for approval with no changes.
> 

> - I have read draft-ietf-mediaman-6838bis-06, and think that it can be
> sent to the IESG for approval with the following issues fixed:
> (reference to github issues)
> 

> - I have read draft-ietf-mediaman-6838bis-06, and oppose publication in
> its current form, for the reasons given in (reference to github issues,
> or inline reasons)
> 

> There are a number of issues open on the draft, resulting from
> preliminary reviews, but the chairs judge these to be relatively minor -
> they need to be resolved one way or the other before we send the draft
> to the IESG, but the chairs think that how we resolve these will not
> affect whether or not the WG has consensus to ask for publication;
> people who disagree with this should use form 3 above.
> 

> If the result of the WG Last Call is conclusive, we may be able to send
> the document to the IESG before Montreal; if it is not, we have our
> agenda set out for Montreal.
> 

> Harald, for the chairs.
> 

> _______________________________________________
> media-types mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

_______________________________________________
media-types mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

publickey - [email protected] - 0x0CEC7748.asc (application/pgp-keys, 1.7 KB)

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 603 B)