[media-types] Re: application/cmw* registration requests
Thomas Fossati <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.types |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA+1=6yfASkbWUc_8_3U0po3Fbuh_PWW6WTzUxzLqrZLEaLan+w@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi, media type experts, Bumping this request to the top of your inbox in case you missed it :-) The document has just been approved by the IESG. Thank you in advance, cheers, t On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 at 12:01, Thomas Fossati <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, media type experts, > > This request is for the registration of the four "application/cmw*" > media types as defined in Section 10.6 of draft-ietf-rats-msg-wrap-17 > [1]. > > The details are included below. > > cheers, thanks! > > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rats-msg-wrap/17/ > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > application/cmw+cbor > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Type name: application > Subtype name: cmw+cbor > Required parameters: n/a > Optional parameters: cmwc_t (Collection CMW type in string format. > OIDs must use the dotted-decimal notation. The parameter value is > case-insensitive. It must not be used for CMW that are not > Collections.) > Encoding considerations: binary (CBOR) > Security considerations: Section 9 of RFCthis > Interoperability considerations: n/a > Published specification: RFCthis > Applications that use this media type: Attesters, Verifiers, > Endorsers and Reference-Value providers, Relying Parties that need > to transfer CMW payloads over HTTP(S), CoAP(S), and other > transports. > Fragment identifier considerations: The syntax and semantics of > fragment identifiers are as specified for "application/cbor". (No > fragment identification syntax is currently defined for > "application/cbor".) > Person & email address to contact for further information: RATS WG > mailing list ([email protected]) > Intended usage: COMMON > Restrictions on usage: none > Author/Change controller: IETF > Provisional registration: no > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > application/cmw+json > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Type name: application > Subtype name: cmw+json > Required parameters: n/a > Optional parameters: cmwc_t (Collection CMW type in string format. > OIDs must use the dotted-decimal notation. The parameter value is > case-insensitive. It must not be used for CMW that are not > Collections.) > Encoding considerations: binary (JSON is UTF-8-encoded text) > Security considerations: Section 9 of RFCthis > Interoperability considerations: n/a > Published specification: RFCthis > Applications that use this media type: Attesters, Verifiers, > Endorsers and Reference-Value providers, Relying Parties that need > to transfer CMW payloads over HTTP(S), CoAP(S), and other > transports. > Fragment identifier considerations: The syntax and semantics of > fragment identifiers are as specified for "application/json". (No > fragment identification syntax is currently defined for > "application/json".) > Person & email address to contact for further information: RATS WG > mailing list ([email protected]) > Intended usage: COMMON > Restrictions on usage: none > Author/Change controller: IETF > Provisional registration: no > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > application/cmw+cose > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Type name: application > Subtype name: cmw+cose > Required parameters: n/a > Optional parameters: cmwc_t (Collection CMW type in string format. > OIDs must use the dotted-decimal notation. The parameter value is > case-insensitive. It must not be used for CMW that are not > Collections.) Note that the cose-type parameter is explicitly not > supported, as it is understood to be "cose-sign1". > Encoding considerations: binary (CBOR) > Security considerations: Section 9 of RFCthis > Interoperability considerations: n/a > Published specification: RFCthis > Applications that use this media type: Attesters, Verifiers, > Endorsers and Reference-Value providers, Relying Parties that need > to transfer CMW payloads over HTTP(S), CoAP(S), and other > transports. > Fragment identifier considerations: n/a > Person & email address to contact for further information: RATS WG > mailing list ([email protected]) > Intended usage: COMMON > Restrictions on usage: none > Author/Change controller: IETF > Provisional registration: no > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > application/cmw+jws > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Type name: application > Subtype name: cmw+jws > Required parameters: n/a > Optional parameters: cmwc_t (Collection CMW type in string format. > OIDs must use the dotted-decimal notation. The parameter value is > case-insensitive. It must not be used for CMW that are not > Collections.) > Encoding considerations: 8bit; values are represented as a JSON > Object or as a series of base64url-encoded values each separated > from the next by a single period ('.') character. > Security considerations: Section 9 of RFCthis > Interoperability considerations: n/a > Published specification: RFCthis > Applications that use this media type: Attesters, Verifiers, > Endorsers and Reference-Value providers, Relying Parties that need > to transfer CMW payloads over HTTP(S), CoAP(S), and other > transports. > Fragment identifier considerations: n/a > Person & email address to contact for further information: RATS WG > mailing list ([email protected]) > Intended usage: COMMON > Restrictions on usage: none > Author/Change controller: IETF > Provisional registration: no _______________________________________________ media-types mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]