Re: UDLR Experiment I-D and IPv6 issue

Hitoshi Asaeda <[email protected]> writes:

On the topic of GRE, is they any reason was RFC3077 references RFC2784,
rather than RFC2784 and RFC2890. Also has any thought been given to
advertising the GRE tunnel characteristics , i.e the key if used, in
addition to just advertising the tunnels transport endpoint address.

Simon


> > 2. IPv6 compliant
> >    Our document does not clearly define the IPv6 issues, 
> >    such as the DTCP IPv6 address. We think that we need to update the 
> >    document to comply with IPv6, at least for the DTCP v6 address. 
> >    Is there any other necessary issue for the IPv6 compliant?
> 
> For IPv6, I at this moment remember we should consider and mention
> following items:
> 1. DTCP (as you said)
> 2. GRE (rfc2784) supports only IPv4 as the delivery header.
> 3. MLD is used instead of IGMP.
> 4. RA (incl. DAD)
> 3 and 4 would be tribial (?). but for 1 and 2, we would need to define
> something new spec.
> 
> Good catch.:)
> --
> Hitoshi Asaeda
> _______________________________________________
> UDLR mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.udcast.com/mailman/listinfo/udlr
> 

--