draft dvmrp and udlr

Hello,

During the last IETF meeting, I noted some comments and remarks about t=
he ID
draft-ietf-udlr-dvmrp-conf-02.txt.
I tried to sum up them here:

* To modify the abstract: to suggest/propose a configuration of DVMRP o=
ver a UDL
to reduce DVMRP scalability issue (it is not only a presentation of DVM=
RP over a
UDL and a return link channel using LLTM).

* In section 2 (DVMRP over a UDL): addition of a section about dvmrp
implementation (version, OS used, ...?)

* In section 2.3 (Passive mode configuration on receivers): to underlin=
e the
fact that a modification is required on receivers. The new commands are=

explained in the section 2.3.2 (Receiver configuration and behaviour).

* In section 2.3.1 (Feed configuration and behavior when almost receive=
rs are in
passive mode): to replace "mtest program" by "an application to join a =
multicast
group".

* To rename the section 2.4 (how to switch between active to passive mo=
de) "When
to switch between active to passive mode ",  this section will explain =
when it
is necessary to switch between the two modes and then how.

* In section 3.1 (Application using a Reliable multicast transport prot=
ocol): to
add explanations about NACK (sent in multicast by the active receive to=
 the
multicast source, the feed forwards the NACK message to the multicast s=
ource and
to the UDL too).

* In section 4 (Other network architectures): to add an introduction to=
 explain
why we describe these topologies.

*...

Is it all ? If you have some other comments do not hesitate to send the=
m! We
will take them into account into the next version.

Best Regards
C=E9line Benassy-Foch

E-Mail : [email protected]
=