Re: UDLR Experiment I-D and IPv6 issue

Izu,

Hidetaka IZUMIYAMA wrote:
>>I have been waited for resuming the process. I believe that we should
>>better to finalize the experimental draft (I will add some section by
>>the cut off date) as soon as possible. After that it is time to
>>discuss what will be next(define new items or close the wg). 
> 
> 
> Yes. I agree.
> So please support to revise the current I-D.

OK. I will take an action very soon and report to the mailing list.

>>Anyway, will we have a meeting slot in Vienna IETF?
> 
> 
> No. We requested, but not accepted.
> We need to have much discussion on the mailing list,
> submit revised I-D and specify the agenda of the meeting.

Understood. Is there any other requirements to have a meeting slot 
except submitting revised i-d? I would also discuss about future steps 
of the WG.

Hope to see you soon.

Jun