Re: Experiment I-D: write DVMRP
Achmad Husni Thamrin <[email protected]> Wed, 30 Jul 2003 15:42:47 +0900
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.udlr |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Okay, here it is. I think three paragraphs are enough to summarize the DVMRP experiment, unless many of you think that I should elaborate some details. 4.4.1 DVMRP DVMRP [RFC1075] exchanges routing information between neighbors and creates a separate MRIB based on the exchanged routing information. With this feature, DVMRP works without any special configuration on UDLRs in terms of enabling multicast routing on the link. UDLRs can carry multicast traffic even though the unicast routing is asymmetric because the RPF procedure looks at the separate MRIB provided by DVMRP. DVMRP, on the other hand, has a well understood drawback: scalability. On a UDLR, DVMRP does not scale to the number of DVMRP routers on the network due to two factors: 1. DVMRP routers advertise poisoned routes; 2. DVMRP routers advertise neighbor lists. These factors give a considerable control overhead and the way to reduce this overhead is to set larger timers for these advertisements. Setting larger timers come at the cost of wasting network bandwidth for unnecessary multicast traffic. Setting larger timers, however, does not solve the scalability problem. Consider the case when a DVMRP router on the UDLR just went active. The router will send many messages during the first seconds after went active to advertise the newly learnt neighbors and routing information. This activity creates a storm on the UDLR with a large number of DVMRP routers. The situation gets worse if more than a router go active within a short timespan. On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 15:37:48 +0900 Hidetaka IZUMIYAMA <[email protected]> wrote: > Husni, > > Thanks a lot. > > Could you send the text of DVMRP section to this ML ? > Because most of people cannot access the document until > revised I-D will submit. > > -- izu -- > -- Achmad Husni Thamrin <[email protected]>