Re: Proposed charter for URL WG
"Martin J. Duerst" <[email protected]> Wed, 26 Feb 1997 19:04:33 +0100 (MET)
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.url |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Pine.SUN.3.95q.970226184930.245V-100000@enoshima> |
On 26 Feb 1997, Rich Petke wrote: > Here is the first cut at a charter for the URL Process & Guidelines working > group. Great work! > Description of Working Group > > This working group exists for the purpose of creating one document: A > guideline for the creators of new URL schemes. The purpose of this > guideline is to help ensure that new URL schemes: > > - Consistently implement the general syntax of URLs as specified in > RFC 1738. > - Are compatible with relative URLs as specified in RFC 1802. > - Are compatible with existing URL schemes. > - Address I18N issues. Very good to have this. > - Have clearly specified character encoding rules. This may be too strict. If we take http or ftp *just as an example*, http doesn't have any clearly specified character encoding rules, and ftp is just starting to move towards getting better in this respect. I would suggest that we combine the two points above to something like: - Address I18N issues, in particular character encoding rules. Regards, Martin.