Re: Call for consensus - I18N issues in process/guide doc
Masataka Ohta <[email protected]> Tue, 11 Mar 97 19:19:14 JST
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.url |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> It has been several days since Martin posted his revised suggestions to the > language of the guidelines and process document and I have not heard any further > comments on the subject. So what? > Does this mean we have consensus? No. How can you uniquely encode a German letter 'A' with umlaut in UTF-8? A single "character" of 'A with diaeresis' or two "character" sequences of 'A' and "combining mark of diaeresis"? Note that my sentence is confusing becasue the definition of "character" in ISO 10646/UTF-8 is broken and confusing. Masataka Ohta