RE: A proposal for URL registration PROCEDURE

Rich, you wrote:
>3) Forward it to a committee for review.  Committee to take no more than
>   x weeks to review.  Committee returns recommendation to IESG for further
>   action (return, approve, forward to WG) with-in x weeks.
>
>4) Forward to a WG for consideration.  (A WG may have to be chartered.)

Do we need different "x weeks to review" if a WG needs to be chartered?
I am unsure as to just how fast this actually occurs (never have really
kept track in my activities).
==========================================================
Mark Leighton Fisher          Thomson Consumer Electronics
[email protected]          Indianapolis, IN
"ViaCrypt?  Vhy not!"