RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-urlreg-procedures-01.txt
Ian King <[email protected]> Thu, 21 May 1998 13:58:09 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.url |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <FFD1BA74C6A7D111A09500805F9F88F5CD6D30@red-msg-43.dns.microsoft.com> |
Thanks, Leslie,I may be confusing recollections of LA and Washington -- I appreciate the clarification. -----Original Message----- From: Leslie Daigle [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, May 21, 1998 1:53 PM To: Ian King Cc: Yaron Goland; '[email protected]'; Alec Dun (Exchange); [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Lisa Dusseault (Exchange); [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-urlreg-procedures-01.txt On Thu, 21 May 1998, Ian King wrote: > I seem to recall that there was considerable discussion about vnd, and the > consensus was that it was redundant or actually undesirable. Does anyone > else want to speak up in favor of vnd? I may have fallen off the thread somewhere, but I rather understood the opposite -- that vnd was agreed on as a necessary categorization. >From the (unedited) minutes from the ietf.org proceedings for LA: "Create three classifications of scheme names: Standard, vendor (start with (vnd."), and private (a.k.a. the NOREG scheme). Mimic the MIME registration procedures outlined in RFC 2048. Standard scheme names will require an RFC that documents them and change control for the scheme belongs to the IESG. Vendor scheme names require a registration form to be completed but RFCs are encouraged. Change control of the scheme belongs to the vendor. Private scheme names do not even require registration." As I read it, vnd and NOREG are not the same thing. I think this was the breakdown that was agreed upon in LA, and it still seems like the most viable path. Leslie. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- "You can lead people to facts, but Leslie Daigle you cannot make them think." Bunyip Information Systems -- ThinkingCat (514) 875-8611 [email protected] ----------------------------------------------------------------------------