RE: Any more input to procedures draft?

> The procedures draft, for the registration, should mention "character encoding
> considerations" as one of the points that a registration has to list.
> This would e.g. mention whether the URL uses UTF-8 (of course with
> %HH-encoding) directly (e.g. applicable for URNs, which are however not
> covered by your draft), whether the URL uses UTF-8, and translation to
> what is used on the wire is given (e.g. IMAP URL), whether UTF-8 is
> strongly suggested, but cannot be guaranteed (i.e. FTP), or whether
> no reliable information is available (e.g. current HTTP).

Shouldn't we move draft-masinter-url-i18n to Proposed? I thought the
ball on that one was in your court.

Larry