RE: OK, so what should people actually do?
Ian King <[email protected]> Thu, 5 Nov 1998 10:46:04 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.url |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <FFD1BA74C6A7D111A09500805F9F88F503B475CE@RED-MSG-43> |
I responded to Craig privately with part of the draft that is currently in preparation; it will be posted to the list soon for comments. The consensus of the group in Chicago was that private URLs should use the OID syntax we discussed. -----Original Message----- From: Yaron Goland [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, November 05, 1998 10:42 AM To: '[email protected]'; [email protected] Subject: RE: OK, so what should people actually do? Having been in a similar situation I have been telling people in my own company to use schemes which start with vnd.ms.*. In other words use vnd followed by the company MIME identifier. This is NOT the group consensus but I can't wait for the group to make up its mind. We have to ship and we had to do something. Yaron -----Original Message----- From: Craig A. Finseth [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, November 05, 1998 9:12 AM To: [email protected] Subject: OK, so what should people actually do? I am working with people who need to actually use a private URL format. To that end, I had written up an Internet Draft proposing an "eid" scheme. I am more than happy to withdraw that draft, but need to actually tell people what to put into a product. Soon. I have looked at the mail archives for this group, but don't seem to see a consensus. Could someone please fill me in on the consensus, if any? Craig