Ping
Ian King <[email protected]> Wed, 10 Mar 1999 17:13:23 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.url |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <FFD1BA74C6A7D111A09500805F9F88F50C76ADD0@RED-MSG-43> |
As I'm sure you're aware, we do not have a meeting in Minneapolis; however, we do have a draft out there, <draft-ietf-urlreg-procedures-05.txt>. I've seen no public discussion of it -- is everyone satisfied with this? (The guidelines draft has already been last-called, but it is dependent upon the procedures draft, due to internal references.) While you're thinking about this, please consider the draft I sent out yesterday on the vnd.* URL scheme tree. It's very deliberately based on the procedures draft, as an example of how alternative trees can be structured and specified. I don't consider it a product of this Working Group, but a "byproduct" of our work; however, Keith Moore asked that the group review it before it goes on to BCP. I'll be publishing this with the I-D administrator tomorrow. Thanks, and I hope to see you in Minneapolis. -- Ian ----------------------------------------------- Ian King <[email protected]> Internet Bill Delivery & Payment MICROSOFT CORPORATION