Re: Proposed amendment to language of draft-ietf-url-procedures

Ian;

> In the recent discussion about a certain URL scheme, it became apparent that

attempt to restrict registration is proven to be silly.

> we had left a hole in our document (draft-ietf-url-procedures-07.txt)

So, abandon it and just let everyone freely register their favourite
URL names.

With such policy, the Internet has been working fine. Everyone can get
TCP/UDP port assigned with his favourite protocol name.

> Please get back to me with any feedback you have as soon as possible, so we
> can get final approval for these important documents we have created.

Which documents, do you think, important?

							Masataka Ohta