Re: NEW NAMESPACE REGISTRATION: KNX
Julian Reschke <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.urn |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 05.09.2023 10:30, Martin J. Dürst wrote: > ... > I'm really concerned that starting to use the term "relative URN" in two > different ways will cause I lot of confusion. I strongly suggest that > the KNX spec do not use the term "relative URN". If it turns out that > there's no good other word for the concept, at least make sure that it's > always written "KNX relative URN", and that the spec clearly calls out > the fact that this is different from "relative URN". > ... FWIW, what *is* a relative URN? A relative reference to be resolved against a base URI that happens to be a URN? Best regards, Julian _______________________________________________ urn mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn