[urn] Re: Updated request: URN Namespace Registration Requ est for "PNO"

For some reason, I didn't get this message from the mailing list.  So
I'm quoting it from Peter's reply.  On the whole it looks fine, but
there's one detail that needs to be fixed:

> On 5/13/24 6:55 AM, Steindl, Guenter wrote:
>> Dear IETF / IANA,
>> 
>> we would like to request the registration of a URN namespace with the 
>> following details:
>> 
>> *1. Namespace Identifier (NID):*
>> 
>> The PROFIBUS Nutzerorganisation e.V. (PNO) [PNO] is an international 
>> association that promotes and supports the development of PROFIBUS and 
>> PROFINET, industrial communication protocols used in automation technology.
>> 
>> We provide standards, certification programs, and resources to ensure 
>> product interoperability and reliability, fostering collaboration among 
>> manufacturers, system integrators, and end-users.
>> 
>> The Namespace Identifier (NID) of all URNs that are defined by the PNO is:
>> 
>>   * NID: pno
>> 
>> *2. Intended Purpose:*
>> 
>> The "pno" namespace is intended to provide a unique identifier for 
>> resources related to our organization PNO.
>> 
>> These resources may include documents, software artifacts, and other 
>> digital assets produced or managed by PNO.
>> 
>> *3. Guidelines for URN Structure:*
>> 
>> URNs within the "pno" namespace will follow the following structure:
>> 
>>   * urn:pno:{PNOresource}:{ResourceSpecificString}
>> 
>> where "PNOresource" is a US-ASCII string that conforms to the URN syntax 
>> requirements [RFC8141] and defines a specific class of resource type. 
>> Each resource type has a specific labeling scheme that is covered by 
>> "ResourceSpecificString", which also conforms to the naming requirements 
>> [RFC8141].
>> 
>> PNO maintains a registration authority, the PNO Registration Authority 
>> (PNO CO), that will manage the assignment of "PNOresource“, and the 
>> specific registration values assigned for each resource class.
>> 
>> *4. Example:*
>> 
>> The following examples are representative URNs that could be assigned by 
>> the PNO CO.
>> 
>>   * urn:pno:profinet:yang
>>   * urn:pno:foobar

Note that the example "urn:pno:foobar" doesn't conform to the syntax in
section 3.  In particular, the syntax requires at least 3 colons in any
PNO URN, whereas this example has only two.  Perhaps this is a typo for
"urn:pno:foo:bar", which does conform to the syntax?

Dale

_______________________________________________
urn mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]