[urn] Re: URN Namespace Registration for International Stand ard Name Identifier

Hi Paul,

Your edits look good. I'm in favor of registering this namespace with 
all due speed.

Peter

On 9/12/24 6:54 PM, Paul Jessop wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Here is the updated registration request. It has been extensively 
> revised to address the comments made.
> 
> I hope the encoding is correct now. I didn’t understand about byte order 
> marks, so this has been an education as well! I don’t think the text 
> actually needs UTF-8 encoding now anyway.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Paul
> 
> Paul Jessop              county analytics ltd
> 
> ---------------------------------------------
> 
> rights - technology - markets - music - media
> 
> ---------------------------------------------
> 
> ISNI                      0000 0005 1119 3335
> 
> ---------------------------------------------
> 
> [email protected]      +44 7850 685378
> 
> On 12/09/2024, 11:09, "Paul Jessop" <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
> Thanks both. All seems sensible. I will rework and resubmit.
> 
> I'm sorry about the text file format. I think I spent my energy on Mac 
> CR/LF issues and neglected the character set mis-match!
> 
> And now that the experts are aware that the minor revision doesn’t 
> affect anything at issue here, it can safely disappear.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Paul
> 
> Paul Jessop county analytics ltd
> 
> ---------------------------------------------
> 
> rights - technology - markets - music - media
> 
> ---------------------------------------------
> 
> ISNI 0000 0005 1119 3335
> 
> ---------------------------------------------
> 
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> +44 
> 7850 685378
> 
> On 11/09/2024, 19:22, "Peter Saint-Andre" <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
> 
> In addition to Dale's feedback, which seems sensible to me, I would
> 
> suggest the following changes:
> 
> - for the registrant, include a role address at isni.org, not Paul's
> 
> personal email address; this can help with future communications
> 
> - because the RFC 8141 registation template does not have a "Background"
> 
> or a "Benefits" section, move that information to the appropriate
> 
> sections in the template (mainly "Purpose")
> 
> - move the "Character set" information to the "Syntax" section (again,
> 
> there is no "Character set" section in the template)
> 
> - remove the sentence about current minor revisions to ISO 27729 since
> 
> that information is rather ephemeral
> 
> Peter
> 
> On 9/11/24 10:08 AM, Dale R. Worley wrote:
> 
>  > There seems every reason to approve this registration. However, I
> 
>  > suggest these small changes:
> 
>  >
> 
>  > - There are occurrences of the character "?" in the document that seem
> 
>  > to replace non-ASCII characters in an original version. These should
> 
>  > either be replaced with appropriate ASCII characters, or the document
> 
>  > revised to use UTF-8 encodings of the original characters.
> 
>  >
> 
>  > - Add a note for implementors that the resolution process may include
> 
>  > one or more HTTP redirections. Implementors should be prepared for this
> 
>  > anyway, but it's useful to warn them.
> 
>  >
> 
>  > - I notice that the current registration template in RFC 8141 doesn't
> 
>  > have an explicit "uniqueness and persistence" section, but I recommend
> 
>  > adding a section on uniqueness to assemble these points, as there are
> 
>  > certain subtleties involved:
> 
>  >
> 
>  > [as already in Background] ISNI does not identify the underlying
> 
>  > natural or legal person and several ISNIs may be associated with
> 
>  > such a person if it presents multiple identities (such as personas)
> 
>  > to the public.
> 
>  >
> 
>  > [as already in Assignment] Where two ISNIs are later discovered to
> 
>  > refer to the same identity, these registrations are merged, the
> 
>  > unused ISNI is retained but marked as deprecated and it is linked to
> 
>  > the other ISNI.
> 
>  >
> 
>  > [It seems to me that what constitutes an "identity" is a *cultural*
> 
>  > question, and specifically not a technical one. Perhaps ISNI-IA or
> 
>  > the ISO standard has nice boilerplate to state this.]
> 
>  >
> 
>  > Dale
> 
>  >
> 
>  > _______________________________________________
> 
>  > urn mailing list -- [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> 
>  > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] <mailto:urn- 
> [email protected]> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> 

_______________________________________________
urn mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]