[urn] Re: Registration request for AR URN Namespace

Hi Dale and Peter,

Do you have an estimated update as to when we would expect a publication onto https://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-namespaces/urn-namespaces.xhtml?

Regards
Quoc


From: Quoc Pham
Sent: Thursday, 19 February 2026 16:26
To: 'Dale R. Worley' <[email protected]>
Cc: '[email protected]' <[email protected]>; '[email protected]' <[email protected]>; Sharon Jonnalagadda <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [urn] Re: Registration request for AR URN Namespace

Hi Dale,

Please do not "send it", I did the update too hastily … here’s the clean v5 version.

Regards
Quoc


From: Quoc Pham <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Sent: Thursday, 19 February 2026 16:14
To: Dale R. Worley <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Sharon Jonnalagadda <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: RE: [urn] Re: Registration request for AR URN Namespace

Hi Dale,

Done! Please refer to the attached and hopefully "send it".

Regards
Quoc


From: Dale R. Worley <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Sent: Tuesday, 17 February 2026 14:21
To: Quoc Pham <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Sharon Jonnalagadda <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [urn] Re: Registration request for AR URN Namespace

"Quoc@ registry. godaddy" <Quoc@ registry. godaddy> writes: > The Key Value example that I provided is a extension we intend to > submit to allow for additional data to be recorded against domain > names. For example a registered
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization.
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd

"[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> writes:

> The Key Value example that I provided is a extension we intend to

> submit to allow for additional data to be recorded against domain

> names. For example a registered business number. So the values are the

> Key (for the attribute) and the value for, well the value supplied by

> the client.

>

> We don’t have an intention in setting a key value in the URN itself.

>

> So … it will be:

>

>     urn:gdr:params:xml:ns:variant-1.0

>     urn:gdr:params:xml:ns:kvlist-1.0

>

> (sorry I released I may have posted an incorrect example in the past

> where the "ns" was missing from the full URN.).

>

> With that clarification, is version 4 of the document acceptable in

> its current form?

>

> Or should we update it to:

>

>       extension = 1*( ALPHA / DIGIT / "-" / "." / "_" / "~")



Definitely update to the latter -- it gives the syntax definition of

<extension>, which the registration needs to do.



Dale

_______________________________________________
urn mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]