[urn] Re: Registration request for AR URN Namespace

Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> Mon, 9 Mar 2026 18:59:35 -0600
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.urn
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Great. I will contact IANA in the next few days and we will be done.

Peter

Sent from mobile, might be terse

On Mar 9, 2026, at 6:25 PM, [email protected] wrote:



Hi Peter,

No worries, we’ve discussed internally and we’re OK with the text that you’ve suggested to we’ve no added it to the registration form. Given this
is likely our last revision, I’ve dropped the "v" reference in the filename as well.

Regards

Quoc

From: Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]>

Sent: Saturday, 7 March 2026 00:11

To: Quoc Pham <[email protected]>

Cc: [email protected]; Sharon Jonnalagadda <[email protected]>

Subject: Re: [urn] Re: Registration request for AR URN Namespace

On 3/5/26 5: 34 PM, Peter Saint-Andre
wrote: > On 3/5/26 11: 53 AM, Dale R. Worley wrote: >> "Quoc@ registry. godaddy"
<Quoc=40registry. godaddy@ dmarc. ietf. org>
writes: >>> Do you have an estimated update as to when we would

ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart

This Message Is From an External Sender

This message came from outside your organization.

ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd

On 3/5/26 5:34 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:

> On 3/5/26 11:53 AM, Dale R. Worley wrote:

>> "[email protected] " <[email protected] > writes:

>>> Do you have an estimated update as to when we would expect a

>>> publication onto

>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-namespaces/urn-namespaces.xhtml?__;!!Hj18uoVe_Lnx!vd0gsCUmZXxmGFH7GsDpwA_xTKi2dc05t7sXR2Ku4zm8RqE2wjX82uPsJ-EORtoJIoSrWeTGopnnJPMUJ8SdUEA$

>>

>> "gdr_namespace_v5.txt" looks good to me. I recommend we approve it.

>

> Agreed. My apologies if I have dropped the ball on this. Given that

> other review team members seem to have been comfortable with this

> request, I will proceed with IANA.

While performing my customary final review and cleanup on the

registration request before sending it to IANA, I noticed that the

completed template does not include a section on Resolution as required

by RFC 8141. My apologies for catching this so late in the process. If

the registrant does not envision resolution of GDR URNs, I would suggest

the following text:

###

Resolution:

It is not foreseen that URNs within this namespace will undergo

resolution and GoDaddy Registry does not plan to operate any

resolution services for "gdr" URNs.

###

Peter

<gdr_namespace.txt>

_______________________________________________
urn mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]