[urn] Re: Registration request for AR URN Namespace
Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> Mon, 9 Mar 2026 18:59:35 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.urn |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Great. I will contact IANA in the next few days and we will be done. Peter Sent from mobile, might be terse On Mar 9, 2026, at 6:25 PM, [email protected] wrote: Hi Peter, No worries, we’ve discussed internally and we’re OK with the text that you’ve suggested to we’ve no added it to the registration form. Given this is likely our last revision, I’ve dropped the "v" reference in the filename as well. Regards Quoc From: Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, 7 March 2026 00:11 To: Quoc Pham <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]; Sharon Jonnalagadda <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [urn] Re: Registration request for AR URN Namespace On 3/5/26 5: 34 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > On 3/5/26 11: 53 AM, Dale R. Worley wrote: >> "Quoc@ registry. godaddy" <Quoc=40registry. godaddy@ dmarc. ietf. org> writes: >>> Do you have an estimated update as to when we would ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart This Message Is From an External Sender This message came from outside your organization. ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd On 3/5/26 5:34 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > On 3/5/26 11:53 AM, Dale R. Worley wrote: >> "[email protected] " <[email protected] > writes: >>> Do you have an estimated update as to when we would expect a >>> publication onto >>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-namespaces/urn-namespaces.xhtml?__;!!Hj18uoVe_Lnx!vd0gsCUmZXxmGFH7GsDpwA_xTKi2dc05t7sXR2Ku4zm8RqE2wjX82uPsJ-EORtoJIoSrWeTGopnnJPMUJ8SdUEA$ >> >> "gdr_namespace_v5.txt" looks good to me. I recommend we approve it. > > Agreed. My apologies if I have dropped the ball on this. Given that > other review team members seem to have been comfortable with this > request, I will proceed with IANA. While performing my customary final review and cleanup on the registration request before sending it to IANA, I noticed that the completed template does not include a section on Resolution as required by RFC 8141. My apologies for catching this so late in the process. If the registrant does not envision resolution of GDR URNs, I would suggest the following text: ### Resolution: It is not foreseen that URNs within this namespace will undergo resolution and GoDaddy Registry does not plan to operate any resolution services for "gdr" URNs. ### Peter <gdr_namespace.txt> _______________________________________________ urn mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]