Re: [Fwd]: 2822 implementation report request

Harald Alvestrand wrote:
   
> Unlike the case of ABNF, where one settled for
> "implementation = parser", and documented "use",
> I don't think a fellow spec is going to be counted.....

The 2234 report counted references, the difference
here could be that RFC 2822 is not only yet another
normative reference in RFC.ietf-usefor-usefor, we
looked at numerous details down to obscure topics
like "semantic content" of a <quoted-string>, the
number of summaries, or the wonders of <obs-phrase>. 

> but if anyone has a conformant implementation of
> -usefor in his news system, that could also be a
> 2822 implementation to report....

That would be of course better, but I'd guess that
only IANA "implements" unnumbered RFCs.

 Frank