Re: Updated erratum

Posted on the rfc.interest list:
 
>| Errata ID: 1081 (2007-11) was updated by Errata ID: 1353 (2008-03).
>| The fix proposed in ID 1353 is clearly better, e.g., ID 1081 allowed
>| (in theory) a toplabel 1-2-3, but ID 1353 requires a leading letter.  
>|
>+ If ID 1353 is verified this should trigger follow-up errata for RFCs
>| 3696, 4408, and ietf-usefor-usefor.  This list might be incomplete.

It might be also too long, RFC.ietf-usefor-usefor could be fixed in
AUTH48:  "<toplabel> is any LDH <label> starting with a letter, and
consisting of at least two characters" is a straight forward concept.

 Frank