Import patch (was: Potential ISSUE: <utext>)

Russ Allbery wrote:

> since you've already tracked most of them down, I think I'm not
> adverse, and mechanical validation of ABNF is definitely useful.
 
> Would you be willing to prepare a patch?  That would be even
> faster for me.

I have no patch tool yet on the W2K box, but I can prepare an XML
snippet for copy and paste, you can insert it where it fits.

Style counter, you start in column 10 with the "=" in column 30:
         newsgroups-line     = newsgroup-name
....5...10....5...20....5...30....5...40....5...50....5...60....5...70..
~~~ cut ~~~
<figure><artwork type="abnf"><![CDATA[
         CRLF                = <see RFC 5234 appendix B.1>
         DIGIT               = <see RFC 5234 appendix B.1> 
         HTAB                = <see RFC 5234 appendix B.1>
         SP                  = <see RFC 5234 appendix B.1>
         WSP                 = <see RFC 5234 appendix B.1>

         argument            = <see [USEFOR] section 3.2.3>
         article-locator     = <see [USEFOR] section 3.2.14> 
         component           = <see [USEFOR] section 3.1.4>
         control-command     = <see [USEFOR] section 3.2.3>
         diag-keyword        = <see [USEFOR] section 3.1.5>
         diag-match          = <see [USEFOR] section 3.1.5>
         diag-other          = <see [USEFOR] section 3.1.5> 
         dist-name           = <see [USEFOR] section 3.2.4>
         msg-id              = <see [USEFOR] section 3.1.3>
         newsgroup-name      = <see [USEFOR] section 3.1.4>
         path-delimiter      = <see [USEFOR] **KERNEL PANIC**>
         path-diagnostic     = <see [USEFOR] section 3.1.5>
         path-identity       = <see [USEFOR] section 3.1.5>
         path-nodot          = <see [USEFOR] section 3.1.5>
         tail-entry          = <see [USEFOR] section 3.1.5> 
         verb                = <see [USEFOR] section 3.2.3>

         display-name        = <see RFC 2822 section 3.4>
         local-part          = <see RFC 2822 section 3.4.1>
         mailbox             = <see RFC 2822 section 3.4>
         utext               = <see RFC 2822 section 3.2.6>
]]></artwork></figure>
~~~ end ~~~

Strike <path-delimiter>, both memos use this only in prose. 

BTW, if you are annoyed how xml2rfc splits some ABNF terms
in prose at the hyphen write &nbhy; (= no break hyphen).

Integration test, I grab this stuff and paste it in the
still open ABNF parser form, result:  No errors, good.

You'll get more than four allegedly unused ABNF terms now,
because I added all terms in angle-brackets in the prose.
But that's as it should be, ignore it.

 Frank