Re: Potential ISSUE: <utext> (was: ABNF nits)
"Charles Lindsey" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.usenet.format |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In <[email protected]> "Frank Ellermann" <[email protected]> writes: >Whatever the WG decided in 2007, the 2822upd modifications >wrt <utext> and NO-WS-CTL are new (2008) events, based on >feedback from Charles, you, and me (among others) on the >rfc822 list. Yes, we managed to get more changed in RFC 2822-bis than we could ever have expected. >Nobody here could foresee that there will be no <utext> in >2822upd before the author pulled it. Technically this is >no problem, because you reference 2822, not 2822upd. But >my confidence that readers can figure this detail out is >limited. I changed the subject to attract the attention >of Harald and Alexey. I still think that, now 2822bis has been accepted by the IETF and will presumably become a Draft Standard, we should revisit USEFOR and rebase it on 2822-bis (firmly resiting all temptations to make any technical changes). It should be quite straightforward, and if Ken is not able/willing to do it, then I will volunteer. Ken? -- Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------ Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl Email: [email protected] Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K. PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5