Re: Potential ISSUE: <utext> (was: ABNF nits)

In <[email protected]> "Frank Ellermann" <[email protected]> writes:

>Charles Lindsey wrote:

>>> based on feedback from Charles, you, and me (among others)
>>> on the rfc822 list.
> 
>> Yes, we managed to get more changed in RFC 2822-bis than we
>> could ever have expected.

>The author successfully avoided the simple approach to adopt 
>our prior work wholesale.  His new <msg-id> (minus obs) is
>now simpler than our form, but allows ">".

And that is the problem. The USEFOR draft permits a whole raft of ugly
stuff that is no longer permitted by 2822-bis (and good riddance to it).
It would be much simpler to say that our message-ids are the same as those
of 2822 bis, but without the obs-stuff and without that ">".

>His <msg-id> plus obs is of course unacceptable for NetNews.
>All pieces are in place for a *future* final merger, but not
>for a sudden rush of AUTH48 modifications.

I doubt we are going to have any opportunity for any "*future* final
merger". If we don't do it now, it will never get done. I doubt any of it
would be the least bit controversial.

-- 
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133   Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: [email protected]      Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9      Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5